Aerosmith is looking for a new singer. Apparently. Then again, last night Tyler appeared with Toxic Twin guitarist Joe Perry to apparently put this kerfuffle to rest.
Previously, Perry had suggested the hunt was on for a new vocalist. So Canada's National Post newspaper weighed in with possible replacements (though read the comments, the reporter apparently didn't check his facts all that well, not surprisingly. I once saw a Rolling Stones review that called the Stones' Live With Me "Nasty Habits" which is a LYRIC in the song, not the song title; folks, do some research, you're hurting journalism's credibility)
ANYWAY: seems like things are worked out, Tyler's still in. But IF he left, or leaves, I would propose someone who was once rumoured to join Van Halen after Sammy Hagar (thrown out there as Aerosmith's next singer) left. Canada's own Sass Jordan.
I think she'd be awesome. Great voice, raunchy, Van Halen made a mistake in going to Gary Cherone of Extreme back then, if Sass was indeed available.
Bands who successfully replaced an iconic singer:
Van Halen, once. Hagar replacing David Lee Roth. Not all VH fans accepted it, but VH actually went on to greater commercial (such as it is) success with Hagar. Next time around, not so successful. The Gary Cherone-fronted Van Halen bombed although I will say that, given a chance and several listens, Van Halen 3, the lone Cherone album, is pretty good. Just different.
AC/DC: went from strength to strength when Brian Johnson replaced the dearly departed Bon Scott. Still, there are many who still swear by the Bon years, and arguably lyrically Bon was best for the band. Still, AC/DC soldiers on successfully.
Genesis: ah, I don't really want to get into prog, not in the mood right now, but anyway, they went on to even greater commercial success with Phil Collins up front than when Peter Gabriel led the troops. But essentially two different bands and approaches, aside from the first 2-3 albums with Collins on lead vox. After ...and then there were three, in came the horns, the sound changed forever, more pop, and so be it. I actually like both versions.
King Crimson: yeah, I know, I said I didn't want to get into prog, but, can't think of any other bands at the moment, may update this post or post more on this topic. Anyway, no matter, Crimson IS Robert Fripp and associates, whoever he chooses to collaborate with, though the best vocalist remains Greg Lake, from the amazing first album In The Court of the Crimson King. Lake of course went on to front Emerson, Lake and Palmer.
KISS: this is for my buddy and KISS fan Rajeev. Who would know the difference? They all hide behind paint. Yes, I know Gene and Paul do most of the singing.
Contributions as always welcome.
Ah, forgot one of my favourite bands, DEEP PURPLE. Ian Gillan fronted the so-called classic Mark II version, after Rod Evans (he sang Hush, their big early hit) left. Then came David Coverdale/Glenn Hughes, who battled essentially for lead vocalist role, then Gillan again with the first Mark II reunion, then the forgettable ex-Rainbow and Ritchie Blackmore friend Joe Lynn Turner (OK, one good Purple song, King of Dreams off Slaves and Masters, great track), then back to Gillan after Blackmore left, and Gillan continues to front the band in the 2000s.
Ranking: 1. Gillan. 2. Coverdale when Hughes shuts up and accepts he's the bass player unless he's singing solo. 3. everyone else.