Arno Kilianski sent me the following response to the Fred Snider's letter to the editor at The Record (Monday's post, Guilty Motorists and winter cyclists). I thought it was worth printing in its entirety:
A letter published on Monday Jan. 28, written by Fred Snider seems to be a
rather scathing attack on the practise of winter bicycling. Now, the man's
concerns are valid-- for about ten days out of the year. The rest of the
year, even in winter, road conditions are not as poor as he describes.
This morning, for instance, after reading Snider's letter, I headed to work in
my compact pick-up truck. The roads I used were perhaps a foot narrower
than normal due to the snowbanks, which were not high enough to restrict
visibility. I should stress that all the roads I used were four lanes
wide, so a foot total reduction is nearly insignificant. Also, conditions
were not slippery.
One of the problems of the "bicycles vs cars on our roads" debate is that
some of the most vocal participants have only a narrow range of relevant
experience. I'm willing to bet that a lot of the anti-bicycling voices
come from people who have never relied on a bicycle for personal transportation
in a sprawling Canadian city with Canadian climate. Conversely, I wonder
how many of the more militant fringe of bicycle advocates have never owned or
driven a car or other motor vehicle. (Of course, I consider myself
sublimely enlightened, given that I've driven cars, light trucks, motorcycles,
and bicycles--both upright and recumbent--on local roads...).
Anyways, let's remember that ( Sorry, but I can't cite a source for this
statistic) in the majority of injury collisions involving a bicycle, the
bicyclist is at least partly at fault, and sharpen our skills accordingly.
P.S.: It's the hallmark of a small mind to consistently greet the
unfamiliar with ridicule and derision. This, I'm convinced, is a
major factor in many public debates, including the "bicycles vs. cars"
debate.